Palabras clave
liderazgo educativo
planificación participativa
sistema de trabajo
participación comunitaria
autorregulación institucional
Cómo citar
Resumen
La planificación institucional en la educación de jóvenes y adultos constituye un proceso estratégico para articular liderazgo directivo, participación comunitaria y mejora educativa. Sin embargo, en diversos contextos escolares esta planificación puede adoptar formas fragmentadas, verticales y débilmente conectadas con el diagnóstico de la comunidad educativa. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo diseñar, implementar y valorar un sistema participativo de acciones orientado a perfeccionar la planificación del sistema de trabajo en una institución de Educación de Jóvenes y Adultos del municipio Amancio, Cuba. La investigación siguió un enfoque mixto con orientación de intervención basada en diseño, apoyado en la modelación, la sistematización teórica, la observación, la entrevista, la encuesta, el análisis documental y la experiencia pedagógica vivencial. Participaron 12 directivos seleccionados mediante muestreo intencional, junto con actores socioeducativos vinculados a los contextos escolar, familiar y comunitario. La intervención se organizó en acciones teórico-prácticas y práctico-transformadoras centradas en liderazgo educativo, planificación participativa, trabajo en red, uso de herramientas digitales e inteligencia artificial, formulación de objetivos e indicadores, y evaluación institucional. Los resultados evidencian que el sistema de acciones favoreció una planificación más contextualizada, colaborativa y orientada a evidencias, al tiempo que fortaleció la implicación de los actores comunitarios en el diagnóstico, la toma de decisiones y la retroalimentación del sistema de trabajo. No obstante, persistieron desafíos asociados con recursos tecnológicos, horarios, conectividad y participación sostenida. El estudio aporta un modelo situado de planificación participativa para instituciones de educación de jóvenes y adultos, con potencial transferible a contextos educativos que requieren fortalecer liderazgo, corresponsabilidad comunitaria y autorregulación institucional.
Referencias
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
Benavot, A., Hoppers, C. O., Lockhart, A. S., & Hinzen, H. (2022). Reimagining adult education and lifelong learning for all: Historical and critical perspectives. International Review of Education, 68, 165–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-022-09955-9
Bierema, L. L. (2019). Adult learning theories and practices. In M. Fedeli & L. L. Bierema (Eds.), Connecting adult learning and knowledge management: Strategies for learning and change in higher education and organizations (pp. 3–25). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29872-2_1
Boeren, E. (2016). Lifelong learning participation in a changing policy context: An interdisciplinary theory. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137441836
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carroll, C., Patterson, M., Wood, S., Booth, A., Rick, J., & Balain, S. (2007). A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2, Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-40
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0
Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632431003663214
Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863253
Ho, C. S. M., & Chen, J. (2026). Entrepreneurial leadership in educational settings: A systematic literature review from 1996 to 2025. Educational Research Review, 50, Article 100762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100762
Hovmand, P. S. (2014). Community based system dynamics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8763-0
Ishimaru, A. M. (2014). Rewriting the rules of engagement: Elaborating a model of district-community collaboration. Harvard Educational Review, 84(2), 188–216. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.2.r2007u165m8207j5
Ishimaru, A. M. (2019). From family engagement to equitable collaboration. Educational Policy, 33(2), 350–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904817691841
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
Lu, J., Walker, A., Banoglu, K., Tang, J., & Gümüş, S. (2026). Future-ready school leadership: Construct clarification, development, and validation of a new measurement instrument. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432261441721
Mayorga, C. A. E., & Flores Polanco, M. I. (2025). Attitudinal Indicator Model for Disability Inclusion in Higher Education: Advancing Sustainable Development Goals in El Salvador. Sustainability, 17(22), 10379. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210379
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Polanco, M. I. F., & Mayorga, C. A. E. (2025). Scientific production in central America (1996–2023): Bibliometric analysis of regional trends, collaboration, and research impact. Publications, 13(3), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13030044
Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
Rubenson, K., & Desjardins, R. (2009). The impact of welfare state regimes on barriers to participation in adult education: A bounded agency model. Adult Education Quarterly, 59(3), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713609331548
Shaked, H., & Schechter, C. (2016). Holistic school leadership: Systems thinking as an instructional leadership enabler. NASSP Bulletin, 100(4), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636516683446
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2026 Dayana Ramos Pantoja, Ermis González Pérez, José Alberto Rosabal Rodríguez (Autor/a)